<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.laborradio.org">
<channel>
 <title>Workers Independent News - IBM</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/201/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Health Study Shows Higher Cancer Among IBM Production Workers - 10/23/06</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/node/4476</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By Doug Cunningham&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A health study by the Boston University School of Public Health’s Dr. Richard Clapp confirms that overall cancer rates are considerably higher among IMB production workers than among the general population. The study is published in the Environmental Health Journal. It includes data from IBM’s own “Corporate Mortality File”. Alliance at IBM, a Communications Workers of America labor organizing group active at IBM, says this study confirms that IBM manufacturing processes are creating serious health issues for workers. The Alliance@IBM wants local, state and federal government officials to do a health surveillance of IBM workers and to require that worker exposure to toxic substances be substantially reduced. The alliance also wants a fund created to help defray medical costs for affected IBM workers and their families.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/33">CWA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/201">IBM</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 17:17:25 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IBM Moving Procurement HQ To China - 10/16/06</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/node/4419</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By Doug Cunningham&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IBM is moving its large procurement division to China. It’s now headquartered in a suburb of New York City. IBM says its relocating its global procurement headquarters to China to take advantage of “emerging market opportunities”. This marks the first time IBM has moved one of its largest divisions to China.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/201">IBM</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 15:50:48 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Court Deals Pensions Blow To Older IBM Workers - 08/09/06</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/node/3909</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By Doug Cunningham&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Older workers at IBM trying to defend their full earned pensions have been dealt a blow by an Illinois federal district court. The court has sided with IBM, finding that the company did not break age discrimination laws when it changed its pensions to cash balance plans in the ‘90’s, slashing benefits for older workers. Linda Guyer, president of the CWA affiliated Alliance At IBM says this case demonstrates why workers need pension benefits spelled out in union contracts. Kathi Cooper, the 55 year old IBM worker who started the class-action lawsuit says she’s already being encouraged by IBM workers to keep fighting all the way to the Supreme Court. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/201">IBM</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 17:24:12 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IBM in class action suit for allegedly not paying overtime - 01/26/06</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/node/2465</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By Doug Cunningham&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;San Francisco attorney Steve Zieff says the class action lawsuit against IBM alleging unpaid overtime for tens of thousands of workers will be a big case with IBM liable for millions of dollars.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Steve Zieff] : &quot;We think what they&#039;ve done is illegal. The motivation I think is pretty simple. By not paying overtime - statutorily required - they&#039;re saving themselves a whole lot of money at the workers&#039; expense.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/201">IBM</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:53:04 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IBM joins attack on pensions, lesson is to organize and fight - 01/13/06</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/node/2373</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By Doug Cunningham&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IBM is the latest big corporation abolishing pensions. Despite a profit in 2004 of $9 billion and a pension fund that holds $48 billion, IBM recently announced its pensions will be frozen in 2008. After that IBM will offer only 401 (k) plans, meaning workers will get less money for their retirement while the corporation takes the money instead.&lt;br /&gt;
Lee Conrad is national coordinator for the Alliance@IBM, a Communications Workers of America union organizing effort at the company.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Lee Conrad 1] : &quot;This latest attack on the pension is mainly affecting long time IBM employees - probably about 20,000 of them. But even IBM executives are saying these people will be impacted negatively on this and will be losing money.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/33">CWA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/201">IBM</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:50:02 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IBM chooses to not genetically screen applicants - 10/20/05</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/node/1726</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By Doug Cunningham&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IBM has reportedly pledged not to use high-tech genetic screening on its workers and job applicants. IBM CEO Sam Palmisano, in a memo to employees, said the computer giant is revising its policies to bar the use of genetic information for personnel decisions. IBM&#039;s Chief Privacy Officer, Harriet Pearson says genetic information comes pretty close to the essence of who you are and you can&#039;t change it. But it has nothing to do with your employment so protecting worker privacy when it comes to genetic screening for personnel decisions is the right thing to do.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/201">IBM</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:37:05 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Alliance@IBM is a unique organizing effort - 08/01/05</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/node/1158</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By Doug Cunningham&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Alliance@IBM is a unique organizing effort that doesn&#039;t go the &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;usual NLRB stacked against the worker route to organize workers. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ralph Montefusco is the national organizer for Alliance@IBM. He says &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the model this CWA affiliated local is using is minority union &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;representation - just signing up members without an NLRB election.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Ralph Montefusco] : &quot;Being a non-majority organization we&#039;re kind &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;of a strange being. because while we are trying to build membership all &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the time we&#039;re not necessarily immediately pushing for a vote and &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;pushing to have cards signed. And we&#039;re doing a lot of advocacy on &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/201">IBM</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 16:22:15 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
