<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.laborradio.org">
<channel>
 <title>Workers Independent News - Congress</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/55/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Senate Passage Of Employee Non-Descrimination Act Uncertain, Faces Bush Veto - 11/09/07</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/node/7237</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The House has passed historic legislation protecting employees from discrimination based on sexual orientation. Jesse Russell has more:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Jesse Russell&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the Employee Non-Discrimination Act will protect employees from discrimination based on their sexual orientation, its fate is not yet known. If it passes the Senate, President George W. Bush has vowed to veto it. Carolyn Maloney of New York explained why she voted in favor of the legislation:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Maloney]: &quot;It is legal in 30 states to fire someone simply because he or she is gay, lesbian, trans, or bisexual. Hard working, tax paying Americans shouldn’t be forced into the shadows and live with the fear that they can lose their jobs.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/55">Congress</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:36:54 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Change To Win: Labor &quot;Blindsided&quot; By Dem Leadership/Bush Trade Deal - 05/16/07</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/node/5925</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By Doug Cunningham&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Change To Win labor federation says the Peru and Panama trade deal with some labor protections House Democratic leaders reached with the Bush administration amounts to a minor tune-up when a major overhaul for workers is needed. Change To Win’s Yvette Pena Lopez says Democrats didn’t cooperate closely with labor on this deal with Bush.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Pena Lopez]: “We were completely blindsided when the press conference happened. And the Democrats, the Democratic leadership, stood together and announced this quote, unquote great deal for the American worker. If it really was a great deal, then we should have been able to stand right next to them and hold hands and say, yes, this is a great deal finally, the day has come. And unfortunately that’s not where we’re finding ourselves.”&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/55">Congress</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 16:41:04 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Change To Win: Labor &quot;Blindsided&quot; By Dem Leadership/Bush Trade Deal - 05/16/07</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/node/5924</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By Doug Cunningham&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Change To Win labor federation says the Peru and Panama trade deal with some labor protections House Democratic leaders reached with the Bush administration amounts to a minor tune-up when a major overhaul for workers is needed. Change To Win’s Yvette Pena Lopez says Democrats didn’t cooperate closely with labor on this deal with Bush.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Pena Lopez]: “We were completely blindsided when the press conference happened. And the Democrats, the Democratic leadership, stood together and announced this quote, unquote great deal for the American worker. If it really was a great deal, then we should have been able to stand right next to them and hold hands and say, yes, this is a great deal finally, the day has come. And unfortunately that’s not where we’re finding ourselves.”&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/55">Congress</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 16:38:36 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Congress Considers Restoring Union Rights For Workers Unfairly Defined As Supervisors - 05/09/07</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/node/5875</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By Doug Cunningham&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the Bush-appointed National Labor Relations Board expanded the definition of supervisor it wiped out union rights for workers who aren’t really in management. Now the Democratically controlled Congress is considering the RESPECT Act to restore union rights taken away by partisan NLRB decisions. Lori Gay, a Salt Lake City RN, testified before Congress on being deprived of her right to join a union by being falsely defined as a supervisor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Gay]: “I&#039;ve been a nurse for 21 years and I&#039;ve never thought of myself as a supervisor or been compensated as a supervisor. I just go to work and take care of patients and once in awhile I have to be in charge of putting patients in beds and assigning a nurse to that patient - which literally takes ten minutes out of a 12 hour shift. And now I&#039;m being (defined as) a supervisor, therefore I lost my rights to belong to a bargaining unit.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/95">Collective bargaining</category>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/55">Congress</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 17:46:28 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Minimum Wage Hike A Casualty Of Bush Iraq War Spending Veto - 05/04/07</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/node/5850</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Minimum wage became collateral damage when President vetoed the Iraq War spending bill. Jesse Russell reports:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Little attention was given to the decision by Democratic leadership to attach the minimum wage increase, a key part of their legislative agenda, to the Iraq War spending bill – a bill they knew President George W. Bush had planned to veto. Under the bill the federal minimum wage would have increased from $5.15 per hour to $7.25 per hour and would have provided tax relief for small businesses. Bush has said in the past that he would support such a measure, but was unwilling to let it pass while being tied with military funding with benchmark dates for U.S.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/55">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/108">Minimum/Living Wage</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 16:02:11 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;Internet Preservation Act&quot; Seeks To Protect Internet Neutrality - 04/27/07</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/node/5799</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The issue of “network neutrality” is back in the spotlight today as forces gather to push Congress to pass legislation that would make preserving “internet freedom” law. Jesse Russell files this report:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More than sixteen months ago, when the telecommunication companies began pushing legislation that would split the internet into two tiers and give them greater control over what Internet users see and do online there was barely a sound. But then a groundswell of supporters rose up, uniting the unlikely cast of organizations such as the NRA, Christian Coalition, MoveOn.org and more, to kill the legislation on the floor of Congress. In order to protect the future of network neutrality Senator’s Byron Dorgan and Olympia Snowe have drafted the “Internet Preservation Act.” According to small business owner Gary Maricle who operates NMchili.com, preserving net neutrality is important for his livelihood:&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/55">Congress</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:49:16 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Medicare Could Save $30 Billion A Year By Allowing Government To Negotiate Prices - 03/09/07</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/node/5441</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By Doug Cunningham&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Medicare prescription drug program could save $30 billion a year if the government were allowed to negotiate lower drug prices. That&#039;s according to a new report from the Center for Economic and Policy Research. Economist Dean Baker says the Veterans Administration and many foreign countries pay as much as 70 percent less for drugs than the Medicare drug program. And fewer people than expected enrolled, also a factor in the lower than projected cost. The bottom line? Congress created a program that&#039;s unnecessarily more costly than if a drug benefit had just been added to existing Medicare with the government power to negotiate lower prices.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/55">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/102">Healthcare</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:09:20 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Rep. Miller Says More Disclosure Needed On 401k Fees - 03/07/07</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/node/5421</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By Jesse Russell&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee is seeking clearer disclosure of hidden fees on 401K plans. Rep. George Miller of California said on Tuesday that “even seemingly small differences in the fees that workers pay can make an enormous difference in the overall size of their 401K.” Miller says that weak disclosure rules have led to most Americans not knowing what fees they are paying. U.S. workers have more than $2 trillion dollars invested in 401K plans.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/55">Congress</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:58:04 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>U.S. House Passes Employee Free Choice Act Labor Law Reform - 03/02/07</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/node/5391</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The Democrat-controlled U.S. House of Representatives has passed historic labor law reform that will make it easier for workers to organize. Jesse Russell reports:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Jesse Russell&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; The Employee Free Choice Act passed on a 241-185 vote, but may find itself stonewalled as it enters the Senate. Anti-worker Republicans have vowed to block the bill and President George W. Bush has promised to dust off his little used veto pen if it reaches his desk. Still, AFL-CIO President John Sweeney called the bill a success for working Americans citing statistics that show union workers make significantly more then non-union workers:&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/32">AFL-CIO</category>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/55">Congress</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:30:34 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Congress Begins Debate On Employee Free Choice Act Thursday - 02/28/07</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/node/5371</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;On Thursday the House of Representatives is scheduled to debate an important bill that could make it easier for working people to join labor unions. Jesse Russell reports:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow the house will take up the Employee Free Choice Act - a bill designed to make it easier for workers in the United States to join a labor union if more than 50 percent of workers sign union authorization cards. Errol Hohrein is a steelworker who sought to organize a union at his workplace. He was harassed by management and eventually fired for his organizing activities. He said there are few protections for working people in the United States:&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/55">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/79">USW and PACE</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:05:19 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Members Of Congress Join Workers Nationwide To Back Employee Free Choice Act - 02/20/07</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/node/5314</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By Doug Cunningham&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Members of Congress are joining workers and unions nationwide for a series of events this week in support of the Employee Free Choice Act labor law reform. The AFL-CIO and the at least 230 members of Congress who support this reform say it&#039;ll strengthen the middle class by taking the fear out of the right of workers to organize. Right now employers are free to intimidate and threaten workers who use their right to join unions because current labor law makes it very hard for workers to form unions and easy for employers to get away with violating the right to organize with no real penalties. This is a week of action nationwide supporting the Employee Free Choice Act and upholding the rights of workers to organize.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/32">AFL-CIO</category>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/95">Collective bargaining</category>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/55">Congress</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:28:13 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cheney Sharpens His Boss&#039; Veto Pen On Labor Law Reform - 02/16/07</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/node/5296</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As organized labor celebrated the passage of the Employee Free Choice Act of 2007 through the House Education and Labor Committee yesterday, Vice President Dick Cheney was busy preparing the President’s veto pen. Jesse Russell has more:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On Wednesday morning Vice President Dick Cheney took some time to speak before a business lobby group and used that opportunity to express the administration’s opposition to the Employee Free Choice Act.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Cheney]: Our Administration rejects any attempt to short-circuit the rights of workers. We will defend their right to vote yes or no by secret ballot and their right to fair bargaining. H.R. 800 violates these principles, and if it is sent to the President, he will veto the bill.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/55">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/27">White House</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:57:30 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Workers To Congress: Our Most Basic Liberties Must Be Restored - 02/09/07</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/node/5251</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By Doug Cunningham&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Workers told Congress Thursday how they&#039;ve been harassed, intimidated and fired for just trying to use their legal rights to form unions. Smithfield worker Keith Ludlum was one of the workers testifying in support of the Employee Free Choice Act, which would end employer intimidation by letting workers form unions when a majority sign cards.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Ludlum] : &quot;In 1994 Smithfield illegally targeted and fired me for my union activities. The supervisors and the deputy sheriff marched me out of the plant in front of all the other employees as an example to intimidate the others.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/55">Congress</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 16:29:18 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Employee Free Choice Act Reintroduced By Congressional Democrats - 02/07/07</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/node/5234</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By Doug Cunningham&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Democratic California Congressman George Miller and Senator Ted Kennedy officially announced the reintroduction of the Employee Free Choice Act in Congress Tuesday. AFL-CIO President John Sweeney urged Congress to pass the labor law reform without delay. It would let workers form unions through majority sign-up and would end employer intimidation by providing real punishment when workers’ union rights are violated. Laura Garren, a nurse with the Oregon Nurses Association, knows firsthand that workers need a stronger law protecting their rights to organize. She saw pro-union nurses get fired and was scared to meet with union reps in public, then had to sit through anti-union meetings as her employer tried to intimidate nurses into staying non-union.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/32">AFL-CIO</category>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/55">Congress</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 17:18:33 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>GOP Continues To Block Minimum Wage Hike, Freezes Congressional Pay - 02/01/07</title>
 <link>http://www.laborradio.org/node/5193</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Republicans bitter from Democrats blocking the Congressional pay raise last year to force a discussion on raising the minimum wage for all Americans have retaliated. Jesse Russel has more:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After Republicans refused to raise the federal minimum wage for the ninth year in a row in 2006, Democrats tried to drive the message home by denying the annual Cost of Living Agreement for Congress. Upset with that move the Republicans slapped back blocking the pay raise for this term. House GOP Whip Roy Blunt of Missouri told the Washington Post that Democrats &quot;are going to suffer in terms of not being &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.laborradio.org/taxonomy/term/55">Congress</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:30:39 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
